11th September, 2003
Ministry of Commerce & Industry  


INDIA, CHINA RE-EMPHASISE SOLIDARITY ON WTO ISSUES AT CANCUN


India and China have re-emphasised their solidarity on WTO issues at the Cancun Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) which commenced today. At a meeting with Mr. Arun Jaitley, Minister of Commerce & Industry and Law & Justice, the Chinese Minister of Commerce, Mr. Lu Fuyuan, said that both China and India belonged to the developing country group and as such shared many common interests and common positions. "China and India are close neighbours especially after the visit of the Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee when bilateral relations have entered a new phase. In the areas where we have a common consensus, we should offer support to each other", the Chinese Minister said adding that both should exchange views on a frequent basis in the next few days at Cancun.

India and China are already part of the 21 member coalition on agriculture in the WTO which is pressing for elimination of trade distorting subsidies and a more equitable world agricultural trade. They are also together in the group of 15 countries on Singapore issues.

Agreeing with the Chinese Minister, Mr. Jaitley underlined that coalition building had ushered in a new area of cooperation between India and China and observed that together both could shape the WTO negotiations and leave an impact on the functioning of the WTO system. Both the Ministers highlighted that the initiatives taken by the countries like China, India, Brazil and South Africa had put the focus squarely on the issue of trade distorting agriculture subsidies given by the developed countries and their determination to hold together, so that their aspirations could find reflection in the Cancun Ministerial Declaration.

The Chinese Minister made the point as a newly acceded member of the WTO, China had already undertaken heavy commitments by way of tariff cuts and it would be improper to expect newly acceded members to take on further commitments without giving them the benefit of special & differential treatment provisions as had been made clear in the joint proposal on agriculture by the group of 21 countries.