14th August, 2003
Ministry of Commerce & Industry  


BJP WELCOMES PROCESS OF CONSULTATIONS ON WTO

JAITLEY SAYS FARMERS' INTERESTS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE


The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has welcomed the process of wide-ranging consultations with political parties initiated by the Minister of Commerce and Industry and Law & Justice, Shri Arun Jaitley, in the run-up to the 5th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) scheduled to be held at Cancun in Mexico next month. Shri Jaitley held consultations here today with representatives of BJP – Shri Venkaiah Naidu; Shri Balbir Punj; Shri Tarun Vijay; Dr. J.P. Gupta; Shri Gopal Aggarwal; and Dr. Jagdish Shettigar. Shri Naidu said that these consultations were very important because "we go to Cancun as a nation and not as a political party or a group…. The issue in WTO is one of national interest. It is not a political matter". Shri Satyabrata Mukherjee, Minister of State for Commerce & Industry and Shri Dipak Chatterjee, Commerce Secretary also participated in the meeting.

Explaining the issues of interest to India in the ongoing WTO negotiations in the context of Cancun, Shri Jaitley emphasised that interests of the farmers would be of paramount importance given that India has the world’s largest proportion of population dependent on agriculture and, therefore, the country has a huge interest in the agricultural negotiations. "Protecting the interests of farmers is our priority. We cannot give the farmers the kind of subsidy that the developed countries are giving and, therefore, they must reduce and thereafter, eliminate their subsidies. Secondly, we have to give reasonable tariff protection to our farmers. We also need additional tariff protection for sensitive items and special safeguards to stop surge in imports", Shri Jaitley said.

Shri Jaitley also outlined India’s concerns and interests in the other areas, viz., non-agricultural market access, TRIPs & Public Health and Singapore issues, including Investment. On Investment, he explained that India had questioned the rationale of treating investment as a multilateral issue and said there could be no compromise on sovereign policy domain in this important area. In services, he informed that negotiations were being conducted on the basis of the request-offer approach and agreed with party members that reciprocity should be the condition precedent in this process in order to derive maximum trade gain for the country, especially in areas where India had competitive advantage.

The BJP presented a paper to the Minister containing, among others, the following suggestions for the government for the Cancun Ministerial: "Emphasis should be on translating spirit of the Doha meeting, specially, with regard to agricultural subsidy support provided by the developed countries under green box and blue box. Similarly, concern of public health in the context of TRIPs should be effectively addressed. Attempts by the developed countries to push additional agenda items such as Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI), competition policy, transparency in government procurement practices, industrial tariff, trade and environment, labour standards etc., should be resisted. Rest of the issues proposed by the developed countries may be considered for detailed discussion only after translating spirit of the Doha meeting. Since these issues, specially MAI is not just linked to trade relations alone but would have impact on wide spectrum of economic areas including sovereign right of the member countries to evolve their own economic policies in the background of domestic socio-economic conditions, such issues require detailed discussion. Moreover, efforts should be made to evolve national consensus on such vital issues. The government should not repeat the mistakes made (in the past) in respect of national interests. Member countries should be reminded that WTO has been set up to facilitate trade. Linking issues such as MAI, labour standards, environment etc., with trade would amount to interference in the member countries’ sovereign rights to formulate domestic economic policies; and as a tactical strategy to resist inclusion of any new agenda, India should demand free mobility of natural persons".