3rd April, 2003
Ministry of Commerce & Industry  


EXPORTS CONTINUE ON A HIGH GROWTH TRAJECTORY

IMPORTS OF SENSITIVE ITEMS, BARRING OIL, SHOW NEGATIVE GROWTH

INDIA PLAYS PROACTIVE ROLE IN WTO

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE: 2002-03


India’s exports have been on a high growth trajectory throughout the year 2002. In fact, the country’s export growth during the first half of the fiscal (April-September 2002) touched 19%. What is particularly noteworthy is that against the export target of 12% set for the year, the growth of India’s exports during the 9 months (April-December, 2002) has been over 20% (in dollar terms). Thus, the double-digit export growth momentum was sustained throughout them year, according to the Annual Report 2002-03 of the Department of Commerce which was released here today.

During April to September 2002-03, Asia and Oceania accounted for the highest growth in India’s export at 29.76% over the corresponding period of the previous year followed by America (29.50%), West Europe (18.14%) and Africa (14.94%). Exports to East Europe grew modestly (6.76%) during April-September, 2002-03. The share of 14 major countries of destinations for India’s exports remained virtually unchanged at 62.8% during the period under review as compared to the previous year. The 14 major countries of destination for India’s exports (along with their percentage share in India’s total exports indicated in brackets) were: USA (20.8%); UAE (6.27%); UK (4.91%); Hong Kong (3.96%); Germany (3.95%); Japan (3.82%); Singapore (3.23%); Belgium (3.09%); China (2.73%); Italy (2.53%); France (1.99%); Netherlands (1.91%); Bangladesh (1.84%); and Saudi Arabia (1.80%).

Regarding import of sensitive items, the Report indicates that, barring import of crude palm oil, import of all other sensitive items showed a negative growth during the period April-November 2002. The total import of 300 sensitive tariff lines for the period April-November 2002 has been Rs. 8,605 crore against Rs. 7,663 crore for the corresponding period of last year, thereby showing a growth of 12%. "However, this growth is almost entirely due to significant increase in the import of crude palm oil, but for which import of all other sensitive items shows negative growth", the Report says.

During the first six months of 2002-03, India’s imports from the Asia and Oceania region was valued at Rs. 38,871 crore which was 10.44% higher over the imports in the same period last year. Substantial imports were also accounted for by regions like West Europe (Rs. 34,580 crore), America (Rs. 13,047 crore) and Africa (Rs. 7,552 crore).

In the post-Doha developments, India continued to play a proactive role by taking active part in all negotiations for which modalities were to be firmed up before March 31, 2003 and final negotiations to be sealed by 2005. On the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), India continues to focus on seeking enhanced market access for developing countries in future negotiations. India has time and again urged that the Work Programme on Implementation Issues should be given the highest priority. Greater attention needs to be devoted to issues about Sanitary & Phyto-sanitary standards and technical barriers to trade so as to fully realise gains in agricultural trade liberalisation. India also stuck to its contention that the Trade-related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) agenda should reflect the concerns of developing world. India’s viewpoints on all these issues were forcefully articulated at the mini-ministerial held in Sydney, Australia, in the middle of November, 2002 and in Tokyo, Japan in February 2003. The next Ministerial Conference is scheduled to be held in Cancun (Mexico) in September 2003.

India submitted initial negotiating proposals on the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) during 2001, covering all the three pillars in the negotiations, namely, market access, domestic support and export competition. This also included India’s stand on special & differential and concerns regarding food and livelihood security and rural development. Non-trade concerns will also be taken into account in the negotiations as provided for in the AoA. During 2002, the government held wide-ranging consultations with stakeholders in agriculture including State/UT governments, representatives of political parties, farmers’ associations, academic and research institutions and eminent scholars. The modalities for further commitments were required to be established by 31 March 2003, and the negotiations are required to be concluded by 1 January, 2005.

In consultation with the administrative Ministries and stakeholders in the concerned sectors, India has submitted request list to a number of Member countries in service sectors of interest to India viz., Architectural Services, Audi-Visual Services, computer & related Services, Health Services, Maritime Services and Tourism Services.

The review of the Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) is underway. The only specific proposal received by the Council for Trade in Goods is from India and Brazil. The joint paper by India and Brazil, which has also been taken up as part of the implementation issues, has proposed amendment to Article 4 of the TRIMs Agreement as part of the review process to enable developing countries to deviate from certain provisions of the TRIMs.

India’s Third Trade Policy review took place on 19th & 21st June, 2002. The previous review had taken place in 1998. During the review, the WTO members commended India for its strong economic performance over the past decade with growth at an average of 6% a year and a reduction in poverty. They noted that this resulted, in great part, from continued economic reform, including trade liberalisation, lower government involvement in economy and liberalisation of key services sectors. They further noted that trade reforms had concentrated on tariff reforms and the removal of quantitative restrictions on imports.

Under India Customs Tariff Act, 1975, a new section 8-B was introduced by Finance Act, 1997, giving power to Central Government to impose safeguard duty. The duty chargeable under this Section is in addition to any other duty imposed under the Act or under any other law for the time being in force, the Report says.

 

 
[previous release] [next release]