LOK SABHA
The maximum number
of complaints in respect of Member of Parliament Local Area
Development Scheme (MPLADS) have been received from Uttar Pradesh.
This information was given by the Minister of State for Statistics
and Programme Implementation, Shri S.B. Mookherjee in Lok Sabha
today.
Replying to a question
by Shri Rajo Singh and Shri Shivaji Mane, the Minister stated
the state-wise number of complaints received as given below:
Uttar Pradesh
|
13
|
Bihar
|
03
|
Maharashtra
|
05
|
Tamil Nadu
|
02
|
West Bengal
|
01
|
Rajasthan
|
04
|
Kerala
|
03
|
Orissa
|
02
|
Jharkhand
|
01
|
The nature of complaints
relates to sub-standard execution of works; delay in release
of funds; delay in sanction of projects and mis-utilisation
of funds etc..
Shri Mookherjee
told the House that as and when any complaint is received either
from an MP or from any other quarters, it is examined with due
care and appropriate remedial action is taken if it pertains
to the Central Government. In other cases, the complaints are
referred to the district heads and State governments concerned
and they are advised to take immediate remedial action.
The reasons for
delay in implementation of MPLADS are:
- Delay in submission of recommendation
of works by the MPs to the district head;
- Frequent changes of works by
the MPs;
- Delay in processing of recommendations
received from PMs by district authorities;
- Delay in preparation of estimates
by the concerned agencies;
- Delay in issue of financial
sanction by the district heads;
- Delay in transfer of funds from
one district to another;
- Non-submission of expenditure
statements by district heads to the Central Goverbment resulting
in delay in release of funds;
- Non-release of funds in time
to the implementing agencies by the district heads;
- Non-availability of/delay in
getting possession of land; and
- Non-compliance of time-frame
by the implementing agencies;
The steps taken
to expedite the implementation of works under the MPLADS include:
- Advice to District Collectors
to process and sanction the works recommended by MPs to the
extent of their yearly entitlement of funds without waiting
for actual release of funds;
- Holding of regular review meetings
with the MPs to sort out problems and to ensure project-wise
allocation of funds as per requirement;
- Request to MPs to give their
recommendations well in advance in a phased manner and not
to cancel or change the works which have already been sanctioned;
- Request to the State Governments
to monitor the programme more intensively; and
- Organisation of workshops and
state-level review meetings to have better interaction with
MPs.